Bridging Competency Standards and Workplace Readiness in Maritime Technical and Vocational Education and Training: A Structured Literature Review
Ezzat Fawwaz Md Nasir · Corresponding Author
Centre of Maritime Excellence Sdn Bhd
Correspondence: jattbujat@gmail.com
Abstract
Maritime technical and vocational education and training (TVET) must reconcile internationally regulated competence, occupational performance, and rapid technological change. This structured literature review critically synthesises evidence concerning competency-based curriculum, simulation, assessment, onboard learning, instructor capability, emerging digital and environmental skills, and institutional policy conditions. A targeted search of scholarly and institutional sources was conducted for publications principally dated 2014–2026, followed by criterion-based selection of 17 illustrative peer-reviewed studies and separate consideration of policy and regulatory documents. Findings were synthesised narratively rather than statistically. Six interrelated findings emerged: the productive but unresolved tension between vocational and academic learning; the dependence of simulation outcomes on pedagogy and scenario design; limitations in the validity and transfer of competency assessments; structural constraints on onboard training; instructor-capability requirements; and curriculum pressures from automation, information literacy, and alternative fuels. The evidence is strongest for describing educational practices and persistent challenges, but remains less conclusive regarding long-term occupational outcomes. An integrated competency-development framework is proposed linking international and national standards to theory, guided practice, workplace experience, triangulated assessment, and continuous industry feedback. For Malaysia, mapping STCW competencies against relevant occupational standards may offer a research and development pathway, subject to formal regulatory validation. Because the review was selective rather than exhaustive, its findings describe recurring evidence themes rather than the prevalence or causal effects of educational interventions.
Acknowledgement
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest
References
de Oliveira, R. P., Carim Junior, G., Pereira, B., Hunter, D., Drummond, J., & Andre, M. (2022). Systematic literature review on the fidelity of maritime simulator training. Education Sciences, 12(11), Article 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110817
Dewan, M. H., Godina, R., Chowdhury, M. R. K., Noor, C. W. M., Wan Nik, W. M. N., & Man, M. (2023). Immersive and non-immersive simulators for the education and training in maritime domain—A review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(1), Article 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11010147
Ghosh, S. (2017). Can authentic assessment find its place in seafarer education and training? Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 9(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2017.1320828
Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2014). Reviewing seafarer assessment methods to determine the need for authentic assessment. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 6(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2014.888133
Ghosh, S., Bowles, M., Ranmuthugala, D., & Brooks, B. (2016). Authentic assessment in seafarer education: Using literature review to investigate its validity and reliability through rubrics. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15(2), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-015-0094-0
Giskeødegård, M. F., & Wahl, A. M. (2025). Signature pedagogies of Norwegian simulator-based nautical training. Discover Education, 4, Article 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00523-5
Harrington, S., Sellberg, C., & Lindwall, O. (2025). Crafting congruence: Towards systematic scenario design in maritime simulator training and assessment. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 24, 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024-00356-3
IMO (2025). Generic interim guidelines on training for seafarers on ships using alternative fuels and new technologies (STCW.7/Circ.25). https://futurefuels.imo.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/STCW.7-Circ.25-Generic-Interim-Guidelines-On-Training-For-Seafarers-On-Ships-Using-Alternative-Fuels-And.-Secretariat.pdf
IMO (2026). Sub-Committee on Human Element, Training and Watchkeeping, 12th session (HTW 12), 23–27 February 2026. https://www.imo.org/en/mediacentre/meetingsummaries/pages/htw-12th-session.aspx
IMO (2025). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978. https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/humanelement/pages/stcw-convention.aspx
Kamis, A. S., Ahmad Fuad, A. F., Ali, S. A., Wan Mansor, W. N., Syed Ahmad, S. Z. A., & Ali Akhbar, M. F. (2026). Maritime TVET in transition: Global trends, institutional innovation, and strategic reform. TransNav: The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 20(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.20.01.14
Karahalil, M., Lützhöft, M., & Scanlan, J. (2023). Formative assessment in maritime simulator-based higher education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22, 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00313-6
Karahalil, M., Lützhöft, M., & Scanlan, J. (2025). Factors impacting curricula in maritime simulator-based education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 24, 545–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024-00351-8
Kim, T., Sharma, A., Bustgaard, M., Gyldensten, W. C., Nymoen, O. K., Tusher, H. M., & Nazir, S. (2021). The continuum of simulator-based maritime training and education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00242-2
Konstantinou, A., & Kostagiolas, P. (2026). Information behavior and digital competencies in maritime studies: A systematic literature review. Reference Services Review, 54(3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2025-0095
Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-017-0130-3
Meštrović, T., Pavić, I., Maljković, M., & Androjna, A. (2024). Challenges for the education and training of seafarers in the context of autonomous shipping: Bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 14(8), Article 3173. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083173
Mori, Y. (2025). An analysis of challenges and impacts of different trends/factors on the implementation of onboard training: Perspectives from maritime education and training institutions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 27, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-025-00803-y
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Sellberg, C. (2017). Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8
TVET Madani. (2026). Officer incharge of a navigational watch on ships of 500 GT or more on near coastal voyages (H501-003-4:2020). https://www.tvet.gov.my/index.php/awam-kursus/kursus?id_kursus=38115
UNESCO. (2015). Recommendation concerning technical and vocational education and training (TVET). https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-concerning-technical-and-vocational-education-and-training-tvet
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens—With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Wiig, A. C., Sellberg, C., & Solberg, M. (2023). Reviewing simulator-based training and assessment in maritime education: A topic modelling approach for tracing conceptual developments. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22, 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-023-00307-4
World Maritime University. (2026). The global onboard training programme (GOBT): A comprehensive review. https://doi.org/10.21677/260105
© 2026 The Author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
